Dutch porn star Bobbi Eden has promised blowjobs for all of her Twitter followers if the Netherlands wins the World Cup.

This reminds me of a couple girls that were down south in the USA promising free sex to all returning marines from Iraq.

So, playing soccer and going to war will get me free sex and blow jobs.

Damn, no love for web designers? Maybe we can barter services.

This was posted on Buzzfeed earlier, and um, all I just can’t beleive a picture like this took this long to get on to the internet.

Seriously? I thought she bathed in semen?

Salon Magazine did an interview with Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá, the authors of the new book “Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality,”, about the sorry state of marriage in the western world, and how monogamy goes completely against evolution.

From Salon:

But Ryan and Jethá also have a theory for what’s causing this misery: From a biological perspective, men and women simply aren’t meant to be in lifelong monogamous unions. In “Sex at Dawn,” which uses evidence gathered from human physiology, archaeology, primate biology and anthropological studies of pre-agricultural tribes from around the world, they argue that monogamy and the nuclear family are more recent inventions than most of us would expect — and far less natural than we’ve come to believe.

You can read more at the Salon web site by clicking here.

This stuff has been written about in hundreds if not thousands of books. For men especially, monogamy is almost impossible, especially after the kids are grown up. The male brain sends a signal saying “hey, look, this woman has given us two kids, they’re both grown up now, they don’t need us anymore, we can leave and start a new family with a much younger and hotter woman”.

Men are visual creatures. We see a hot babe, the blood flow to the brain stops and it all goes straight to the penis, wanting us to “pro-create”.

Kinda like when I see the Brooklyn Decker, all I want to do is have unprotected sex with her. She’s so hot that I wouldn’t care how many baby’s I’d have with her. Hot babes are much better to have baby’s with. Who wants to have make a baby with an ugly chick? You’ll be thinking to yourself “Fuck, if that’s what she looks like now, imagine what she’s going to look like in 18 years”. That’s when you jump off a bridge.

So, where do I leave my deposit? From Mashable.com:

Every child is beautiful (well, not really, but that’s the cliche, right?), and now — thanks to BeautifulPeople.com — you can up the chances of having offspring worthy of a baby modeling career. That’s right, the controversial dating site now has a forum/sperm bank where one may search for genetic material from beautiful people and beautiful people alone.

Back in the winter months, BeautifulPeople.com — a dating website that only allows attractive people to join based on the democratic vote of its members — gained its share of media attention after expelling 5,000 people after they packed on the holiday pounds. Back then, Founder Robert Hintze said, “Letting fatties roam the site is a direct threat to our business model and the very concept for which BeautifulPeople.com was founded.”

Now, the site is taking further steps in the fight against unattractiveness (at least unattractiveness as gauged by people who dig conventionality) by launching a fertility introduction service that allows both members and non-members to score the stuff that dream babies are made of. According to Managing Director Greg Hodge, “There are no financial benefits for us in doing so — we are simply responding to a demand for attractive donors. Every parent would like their child to be blessed with many fine attributes, attractiveness being one of the most sought after. For a site with members who resemble Brad Pitt, George Clooney and Angelina Jolie you can imagine the demand.”

Hintze added that initially the service was to be limited to hotties and hotties alone, “But everyone — including ugly people — would like to bring good looking children in to the world, and we can’t be selfish with our attractive gene pool.” How very generous of him.

This is just stupid. These are most idiotic group of fucking morons I have ever read about. Besides, I rather do it the old fashion way, by having unprotected sex with some hot girl I meet at a club. DUH!

And for the record, this is totally eugenics.

Obviously the dick head that runs this site has never read a book on psychology or evolution. Men, obviously like hot women, that’s in our genes, that’s how we work, so ladies, stop complaining to us about it. Whereas women, yes, they do like an attractive man, but the physical aspect of it is no where as close to what it is for men.

Women prefer a man who can provide security (next time you meet a gold digger, don’t blame her, its in her genes), and has a great personality. That’s it. A man get far further with his personality than a woman can.

Take my word for it, the people that end up meeting eachother on these sites are usually the ones that ask of if Tuna is a form of Chicken.

I always knew I was special, Scientific American Reports:

This conjuring ability to create fantasy scenes in our heads that literally bring us to orgasm when conveniently paired with our dextrous appendages is an evolutionary magic trick that I suspect is uniquely human. It requires a cognitive capacity called mental representation (an internal “re-presentation” of a previously experienced image or some other sensory input) that many evolutionary theorists believe is a relatively recent hominid innovation.

When it comes to sex, we put this capacity to very good—or at least, very frequent—use. In a now-classic, pre-Internet-porn (I’ll get to that later on) study by British evolutionary biologists Robin Baker and Mark Bellis, male university students were found to masturbate to ejaculation about every 72 hours, and “on the majority of occasions, their last masturbation is within 48 hours of their next in-pair copulation.” If they’re not having intercourse every day, that is to say, men tend to pleasure themselves to completion no more than two days prior to having actual sex.

Question is, are you master of your domain?

Click here to read the rest of the article from Scientific American. You know you want to.

So hot WOW babe Adrianna Curry was tweeting about Kendra Wilkinson earlier today and her sex tape. Needless to say, she’s got no sympathy for her. Oh Adrianna also mentioned that she had a sex tape once. I think tongue may have been planted firmly in cheek, but I have no idea.

I think Adrianne should invite Kendra over and talk it out. You know, just do what two girls do when they’re discussing things. Get into their panties, lay on the the bed, kissing with their legs wrapped around eachother.

I think that’s a good idea. Who’s with me?

Here she is on E! saying how heartbroken she is.

Vivid released a trailer to the Kendra Wilkinson sex tape which is out now. (NSFW)

Whatever. She was actively trying to sell the damn thing before it came out. The only people I feel sorry for are members of her family, and people in the amazon who have to see the rain forest chopped down even more so they can make more Kleenex tissues so guys having something to wipe themselves with after watching that movie.

Though, from what I’ve heard, its a good porno. People on Twitter see to be impressed by it.

Sunny Leone loves the Kendra Wilson sex tape

…And so does Lupe Fuentes

…and Kendra Tate

From Gawker.com

Two Russian girls paid $3000 to come to America for work. They were told to report to a shady New York nightclub to become ‘hostesses’. A concerned friend posted about it on Metafilter. They were apparently saved.

The full story can be read here.

The internet is full of amazing things, and its full of horrible things.

If you’ve ever read the comments section on news sites, you’ll find that most people in there have serious mental health issues.

Damn that aunt flo!

I’m never having kids.